The ThirdEye Concept
News: Does Maya Calendar Predict 2012 Apocalypse?
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 14, 2007, 02:54:32 PM
"Mushroom" Aurora in Norway


Apollo 16


Unidentified


Aldbourne Crop Circle 2005


Grand Canyon


NGC 6543


Birds


The View


Egyptian Structures

ThirdEye Discussions
How far is too far when i...
[Today at 02:21:38 PM]

by riktus
[Today at 01:56:53 PM]

Japanese Biker Fails to N...
by a.D
[Today at 12:28:12 PM]

Russian train derailed by...
[Today at 11:40:29 AM]

[Today at 11:37:36 AM]

Fire blazes at new Shangh...
[Today at 11:36:53 AM]

[Today at 11:35:52 AM]

[Today at 11:34:52 AM]

[Today at 11:32:09 AM]

[Today at 11:26:37 AM]


Topic Summary
Posted on: March 09, 2006, 09:31:43 PM
Posted by: a.D
House votes to remove food label warnings, bowing to pressure from companies

The House of Representatives voted Wednesday to strip many warnings from food labels, potentially affecting alerts about arsenic in bottled water, lead in candy and allergy-causing sulphites, among others.

Pushed by food companies seeking uniform labels across state lines, the bill would prevent states from adding food warnings that go beyond federal law. States could petition the Food and Drug Administration to add extra warnings, under the bill.

Legislators approved the bill on a 283-139 vote. Supporters expect a Senate version of the bill to be introduced soon.

"This bill is going to overturn 200 state laws that protect our food supply," said Representative Henry Waxman (D-Calif.). "Why are we doing that? What's wrong with our system of federalism?"

The bill's supporters argue that consumers deserve the same warnings on supermarket shelves across the country. The bill would allow a state to seek a countrywide warning from FDA.

"We ought to do it in all 50 states," said Representative Mike Rogers, (R-Mich.). "Chicken grown in Louisiana is going to end up on a plate in Michigan."

Rogers mentioned a warning his own state about allergy-causing sulphites: "If they're bad for Michigan citizens, I think they're bad in all of the other 49 states," he said.

Countrywide, as many as 200 state laws or regulations could be affected, according to the Congressional Budget Office. They include warnings about lead and alcohol in candy, arsenic in bottled water and many others.

The government would spend at least $100 million US to answer petitions for tougher state rules, according to CBO.

Opponents of the bill scored one victory Wednesday: State warnings about mercury in fish would remain. Legislators amended the bill to let states keep those warnings.

yahoo
Posted on: February 27, 2006, 08:40:35 PM
Posted by: a.D
Tell your Congressman or Congresswoman to vote "No" on House of Representatives Bill H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act," coming to a vote in Washington, D.C this Thursday, March 2

The House of Representatives will vote this week on a controversial "national food uniformity" labeling law that will take away local government and states' power to require food safety food labels such as those required in California and other states on foods or beverages that are likely to cause cancer, birth defects, allergic reactions, or mercury poisoning. This bill would also prevent citizens in local municipalities and states from passing laws requiring that genetically engineered foods and ingredients such as Monsanto's recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH) be labeled.

The House will vote March 2, 2006 on a bill that would gut state food safety and labeling laws. H.R. 4167, the "National Uniformity for Food Act," lowers the bar on food safety by overturning state food safety laws that are not "identical" to federal law. Hundreds of state laws and regulations are at risk, including those governing the safety of milk, fish, and shellfish. The bill is being pushed by large supermarket chains and food manufacturers, spearheaded by the powerful Grocery Manufacturers of America.

Big food corporations and the biotech industry understand that consumers are more and more concerned about food safety, genetic engineering, and chemical-intensive agriculture, and are reading labels more closely. They understand that pesticide and mercury residues and hazardous technologies such as genetic engineering and food irradiation will be rejected if there are truthful labels required on food products. Industry-sponsored H.R. 4167 is gaining momentum and must be stopped! Act now! Preserve local and regional democracy and protect yourself and your family from unsafe food by sending an email or calling your Representative and urging them to vote "No" on H.R. 4167.

Please Take Action Now--Send a Message to Your Congress Member in the House of Representatives to Vote "No" on H.R. 4167 (read full text of the bill here)

url
Powered by SMF SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC | smFox Rediscoverd
News Free Movies Conspiracy Unexplained Music Videos Forum
Copyright © ThirdEyeConcept.Com 2005-2007 Website Disclaimer

TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Page created in 0.294 seconds with 21 queries.